SLP(C) 32128/14
                                                           1
                                                O U T     T O D A Y
  ITEM NO.56                                    COURT NO.5                        SECTION XIV
                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
  Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                              No.32182/2014
  (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/11/2014
  in LPA No. 374/2013 passed by the High Court Of Delhi at N. Delhi)
  VIACOM 18 MEDIA PVT LTD                                                          Petitioner(s)
                                                          VERSUS
  UNION OF INDIA AND ANR                                                           Respondent(s)
  (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned
  judgment and permission to place addl. documents on record)
  Date : 28/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.
  CORAM :
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
  For Petitioner(s)                      Mr.   Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv.
                                         Dr.   Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
                                         Ms.   Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv.
                                         Ms.   Liz Mathew, AOR
                                         Mr.   Abhishek Malhotra, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Angad Dugal, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Karan Lahiri, Adv.
                                         Mr.   M.F. Philip, Adv.
  For Respondent(s)
                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R
                                 Issue notice, returnable on 8th December, 2014.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
Chetan Kumar
Date: 2014.11.28
15:06:33 IST
Reason:
                                 Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
                                 As     an   interim    measure,    it     is    directed   that   the
                         direction    issued   by   the    High    Court    by    its   order   dated
SLP(C) 32128/14
                                  2
       24th November, 2014, banning the channel in toto with effect
       from 26th November, 2014, shall remain stayed.   However, the
       direction to remove the programmes or telecasting them in the
       channel, shall remain operational.   However, we clarify that
       if eventually we do not accept the submissions raised by
       Mr. Harish N. Salve and Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned
       senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, the remaining
       period for which the channel was banned, shall revive.
              (Chetan Kumar)                   (H.S. Parasher)
               Court Master                      Court Master

Continue Reading