SLP(C) 32128/14
1
O U T T O D A Y
ITEM NO.56 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.32182/2014
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/11/2014
in LPA No. 374/2013 passed by the High Court Of Delhi at N. Delhi)
VIACOM 18 MEDIA PVT LTD Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Respondent(s)
(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned
judgment and permission to place addl. documents on record)
Date : 28/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv.
Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR
Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Adv.
Mr. Angad Dugal, Adv.
Mr. Karan Lahiri, Adv.
Mr. M.F. Philip, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Issue notice, returnable on 8th December, 2014.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
Chetan Kumar
Date: 2014.11.28
15:06:33 IST
Reason:
Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
As an interim measure, it is directed that the
direction issued by the High Court by its order dated
SLP(C) 32128/14
2
24th November, 2014, banning the channel in toto with effect
from 26th November, 2014, shall remain stayed. However, the
direction to remove the programmes or telecasting them in the
channel, shall remain operational. However, we clarify that
if eventually we do not accept the submissions raised by
Mr. Harish N. Salve and Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned
senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, the remaining
period for which the channel was banned, shall revive.
(Chetan Kumar) (H.S. Parasher)
Court Master Court Master
We welcome your suggestions and feedback at mail@onelawstreet.com
