NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI
CONSUMER CASE NO. 870 OF 2015
Union of India ………..Complainant
versus
Nestle India Limited, Nestle House ………..Opposition Party
CORAM:
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Jain, Presiding Member
- Hon’ble Dr. B.C. Gupta, Member
COUNSEL
For the Complainant :
- Sanjay Jain, ASG
- Mrinalini S. Gupta, Advocate,
- Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate
- Mrinima Chatterjee, Advocate,
- Natasha Thakur, Advocate,
- Rayul Jain, Advocate
- Divya Pandey, Advocate,
For the Opposition Party
None
Date: 17 August 2015
ORDER
Heard.
Admitted, subject to just exceptions.
Issue notice to the opposite party for 30.09.2015, requiring it to give its version of the case, within 30 days. ‘Dasti’ service within three days.
The learned ASG submits that the complainant wants the product, which is available with the concerned authorities, in the original packings, to be sent to an appropriate laboratory for the purpose of analysis and testing in terms of Section 13(C) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The complainant is permitted to file an appropriate application in this regard.
J V.K. Jain. Presiding Member
Dr. B.C. Gupta, Member
Read more: Govt files class action suit against Nestle on behalf of Maggi consumers for Rs. 640 crores
