SECTION PIL (WRIT) MATTER FOR : 21..11.2014
COURT NO. : 2
ITEM NO. : 31
BEFORE LEARNED REGISTRAR'S COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 177 OF 2013
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India)
WITH
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2
(Application for Direction filed by Mr. Vijay Panjwani, Adv.)
Kamlesh Vaswani ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
The Writ Petition above-mentioned was listed before the
Hon'ble Court on 15.04.2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the
following Order:-
"Issue notice, returnable two weeks hence
(29.04.2013).
Let the Union of India and the other
respondents be served, both in the usual course
and also by way of Dasti service. "
Pursuant to above Order, it is submitted that Show Cause
Notice was issued to all the four Respondents through Registered A.D.
as well as Dasti.
Mr. Vijay Panjwani, Advocate for the Petitioner has on
2.5.2013 filed Proof of Dasti Service after serving copy of Notice upon
Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4.
It is further submitted for kind information of the Hon'ble
Court that Vakalatnama/appearances have been filed by Counsel on
behalf of the following Respondents:-
Srl. Filed by Filed on On behalf of States/UTs
No. Advocates
1. Mr. D.S. Mahra 21.4.2014 Ministry of Information & Technology (R-1)
2. Mr. D.S. Mahra 5.6.2013 Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (R-2)
3. Mr. Rahul Naryan 12.11.2013 Internet Service Providers Association of India
(R-4)
It is further submitted that Union of India through its
Secretary, Department of Telecommunications was impleaded as Party
Respondent No. 5 vide Hon'ble Court's Order dated 18.11.2013.
It is further submitted that Counter Affidavits have been filed
by Counsels on behalf of the following Respondents:-
Srl. Filed by Filed on On behalf of States/UTs
No. Advocates
1. Mr. D.S. Mahra (i) 21.4.2014 Ministry of Information & Technology
(ii) 28.4.2014 (R-1)
2. Mr. D.S. Mahra 7.2.2014 Ministry of Information & Broadcasting
(R-2)
3. Mr. Rahul Naryan 21.1.2014 Internet Service Providers Association of
India (R-4)
4. Mr. D.S. Mahra 21.4.2014 Secretary, Dept. of Telecommunications
(R-5)
Service of Notice is complete and all the aforesaid Affidavits
stands included in the Paper Books.
It is further submitted that neither Vakalatnama/appearance
nor Counter Affidavit has been filed in respect of Respondent No. 3
(The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs) so far.
It is next submitted that Ms. Jyotika Kalra, Advocate has on
26.4.2013 filed Application for Impleadment to implead Hamari
Sanskriti as a Party Respondent which was registered as I.A. No. 1 and
stands included in the Paper Books.
It is next submitted that Mr. Prasanth P., Advocate has on
25.8.2014 filed Application for Impleadment on behalf of Mr. Elvis
Kottoor to implead as a Party Respondent. The said Application has
been registered as I.A. No. 3 and stands included in the Paper Books.
The Writ Petition above-mentioned was listed before the
Hon'ble Court from time to time and lastly listed on 17.10.2014, when
the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:-
"Applications for impleadment are
allowed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is
directed to amend the cause-title suitably
forthwith.
Call these matters after four weeks."
Pursuant to above Order, It is submitted that Hamari Sanskriti
(Rgd.) and Mr. Elvis Kottoor respectively were impleaded as Party
Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and Amended Cause Title stands included in
the Paper Books.
The Writ Petition alongwith applications above-mentioned is
listed before the Registrar's Court with this Office Report for orders.
Dated this the 20 t h day of November, 2014.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| DISCLAIMER |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| OFFICE REPORT IS ONLY FOR ASSISTANCE OF THE HON'BLE COURT. ALTHOUGH EVERY EFFORT HAS |
| BEEN MADE TO GIVE UPDATED, CORRECT AND COMPLETE INFORMATION, BUT THE CORRECTNESS |
| OF THE CONTENTS OF THE OFFICE REPORT MAY BE VERIFIED FROM THE ORIGINAL CASE FILE. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
