Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO.474 OF 2013
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1728 OF 2007
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMON ... PETITIONER(S)
VS.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. STF.CBI,MUMBAI ... RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
We have heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the review
petitioner and the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent, at
length. We have gone through the judgment sought to be reviewed and we
have considered the arguments advanced on both sides. As requested, we
have also gone through the judgment of the trial court, in order to
appreciate the contention on conviction and sentence. We find that all the
arguments advanced by the review petitioner have been considered in detail
in the judgment which is sought to be reviewed. Hence, we do not find any
error apparent on the face of record or any other ground so as to warrant
interference in exercise of our review jurisdiction.
The review petition is hence dismissed.
..............J.
[ANIL R. DAVE]
..............J.
[J. CHELAMESWAR]
..............J.
[KURIAN JOSEPH]
New Delhi;
9th April, 2015.