SC dismisses appeal of Chautala father-son duo against 10 years term [READ ORDER]
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).4658/2015
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/03/2015 in CRLA No. 213/2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)
OM PRAKASH CHAUTALA …Petitioner(s)
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR …Respondent(s)
SLP(Crl) No. 4831/2015, SLP(Crl) No. 4871/2015, SLP(Crl) No. 4874/2015, SLP(Crl) No. 4913/2015, SLP(Crl) No. 4929/2015, SLP(Crl) No. 5051/2015, SLP(Crl) No. 3563/2015, SLP(Crl) No. 3646/2015, SLP(Crl) No. 4023/2015, SLP(Crl) No. 4029/2015, CRL.M.P.NO.10595/2015 IN SLP(Crl) No. 3782/2015
Date : 03/08/2015
These petitions were called on for hearing today.
- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
Mr. Harish Salve,Sr.Adv., Dr. A.M. Singhvi,Sr.Adv., Mr. V.K. Bali,Sr.Adv., Mr. Puneet Bali,Sr.Adv., Dr. Rajeev Dhawan,Sr.Adv., Mr. Dhruv Kapur,Adv., Mr. Aditya Soni,Adv., Mr. Vijayender Kumar,Adv., Mr. Siddharth Bhatia,Adv., Mr. Manoj Swarup,Adv., Mr. Akshat Goel,AOR
Dr. Rajeev Dhawan,Sr.Adv., Mr. Manoj Swarup,Adv., Mr. Akshat Goel,AOR,
Dr. Rajeev Dhawan,Sr.Adv., Ms. Anju Vaid,Adv., Mrs. Shiel Sethi,AOR
Mr. L.N. Rao,Sr.Adv., Mr. R.S. Cheema,Sr.Adv., Ms. Tarannum Cheema,Adv., Mr. Dhruv S.,Adv., Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv., Mr. Amit Sahni,Adv.
Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi,Sr.Adv., Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah,Adv., Mr. Ishant Das,Adv., Mr. Sumit Arora,Adv.,
Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah,Adv., Mr. Ishant Das,Adv., Mr. Sumit Arora,Adv.
Mr. G.M. Akbar Ali,Sr.Adv., Mr. Saurabh Jain,Adv., Mrs. Shiel Sethi,AOR
Mr. Vikas Singh,Sr.Adv., Mr. Anju Vaid,Adv., Mrs. Shiel Sethi,AOR
Mr. Subramanium Prasad,Sr.Adv., Mr. Rajeev Dalal,Adv., Mr. Utkarsh Srivastava,Adv.
Mr. V.K. Bali,Sr.Adv., Mr. Aditya Soni,Adv., Mrs. Shiel Sethi,AOR
Mr. Vikas Pahwa,Sr.Adv.
Mr. B.V. Niren,Adv., Mr. Udit Gupta,Adv., Mr. S. Gowthaman,Adv.
Mr. Dushyant Parashar,AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
We are not inclined to entertain any of these petitions, all are dismissed.
Whosoever has got any physical ailment or needs medical treatment, they are always at liberty to move the High Court and seek for appropriate directions.
(NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR)
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Latest posts by Mohit Singh (see all)
- “Video conferencing cannot be directed in transfer petition” holds SC by 2:1, overrules Krishna Veni Nagam - October 9, 2017
- SC asks Centre, social media websites on AoR’s petition for keeping Indians’ data in India - September 7, 2017
- PIL before SC seeks J Lodha Panel’s recommendations to be declared unconstitutional + reference to 7 judge bench - January 6, 2017